Research Article |
Corresponding author: Alexander I. Ksenofontov ( aiksenofontov@mephi.ru ) Academic editor: Yury Kazansky
© 2024 Marine T. Hakobyan, Nikolay R. Avakyan, Alexander I. Ksenofontov.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Hakobyan MT, Avakyan NR, Ksenofontov AI (2024) Specifics of radioactive waste management at the power unit No.2 of the Armenian nuclear power plant. Nuclear Energy and Technology 10(2): 117-122. https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.10.130134
|
This paper discusses a detailed description of the management of radioactive waste (RW) generated during operation at power unit No. 2 of the Armenian NPP during the design and additional (extended) life of the Armenian NPP power unit. The resulting RW of different types (solid, liquid, gaseous) and of different classes, from very low to high activity, which are regulated according to the rules and norms of radiation safety, are described. Options for the preparation of RW for long-term storage with solid medium-active and low-active RW at the industrial site of the Armenian NPP are considered. The principles of continuous step-by-step improvement of safety through modernization are proposed, which implies performing analyses of compliance of the power unit with the requirements of modern safety regulations, including international ones, based on modern technologies, IAEA recommendations, probabilistic safety assessments and analysis of local and international operating experience, lessons learned from accidents and incidents at nuclear power plants, elimination of deviations from existing standards and rules. It is proposed to introduce new technologies and facilities for processing intermediate storage of RW before disposal, improve and modernize existing storage facilities, and create new storage volumes that ensure the safe operation of the Armenian NPP power unit, including extending the service life and decommissioning of power units.
The omissions in the management system that create difficulties in handling RW in the Republic of Armenia are indicated. The models of increasing the safety level of RW storage at nuclear power plants by introducing a unified RW management system are formulated, which will reduce the formation of RW of various types and activities, improve and expand the system of safe management of RW and SNF in the Republic of Armenia.
NPP, nuclear energy, radiation safety, radioactive waste management
The Armenian NPP (ANPP), the region’s only nuclear facility, has been in operation in the Republic of Armenia for forty years (since 1976) (
It should be noted that the ANPP’s WWER-440 reactor (V-270 design) has been improved against its prototype units (Novovoronezh 3 and 4, and Kola 1 and 2). No incidents have been recorded in the course of the ANPP’s 14-year operation, involving a nuclear or radiological safety violation under the INES international nuclear event scale (
This has undoubtedly been achieved thanks to special emphasis placed on safety issues and continued safety improvements practically since the early days of the ANPP operation.
With regard for the development of regulatory requirements for the NPP safety, a principle is implemented for the continuous phased improvement of safety via upgrades. The upgrading strategy is based on analyzing the power unit compliance with current regulatory requirements on safety and probabilistic safety analyses, and on reviewing the local and international experience of operation, and the lessons learned from accidents and incidents at NPPs. Upgrades are planned with regard for the IAEA guidelines (
Long-term operation of the ANPP’s unit 2 in the course of its design and extended life has proved it to be highly reliable, and has confirmed the adequacy of the design safety principles selected. High structural margins adopted for the reactor facility and the results achieved in safety improvements are expected to form the basis for the decision to prepare for another unit life extension.
The general ANPP safety improvement program lays emphasis on environmental issues, including safe handling of radioactive waste (RW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF) (
The key goals of a stable NPP life support system are to:
Operations involving radioisotopes were started in the Republic of Armenia in the 1950s and reached the peak level in the mid-1980s in nearly all sectors and fields of economy (health care, industry, science and education, agriculture, geology, etc.), leading thus to radioactive waste generation (
Generation of radioactive waste caused by nuclear technologies dates back to the commencement of operations at the Armenian NPP units. To isolate radioactive municipal waste from the biosphere, a radioactive waste storage facility was built in the 1950s by resolution of the Yerevan City Council. However, after landslide phenomena were detected in the storage facility area, a decision was made to build a new near-surface storage facility at the ANPP site, which was put into operation in 1980.
Operation of the new facility suggested collection of solid and liquid waste formed, transportation of waste to the storage facility, its grouting up to a state acceptable for long-term storage, and placement of grouted waste in reinforced concrete casks (
Since the storage facility was operated with major design deviations (no waste grouting equipment and dedicated remotely controlled manipulators), the license issued in 2009 permitted the facility to be used only for storing low and intermediate level municipal radioactive waste.
Later on, the Armenian NPP unit in the process of decommissioning became a major source of RW generation. In 2017, in accordance with the resolution by the Government of the Republic of Armenia, criteria were defined for the safe RW and SNF handling (
Radioactive waste of different types (solid, liquid, gaseous) and different classes (in a range from very low to high level, Fig.
The Armenian NPP design did not initially include areas for reprocessing solid radioactive waste (SRW) generated in the process of operation, and the RW formed has been stored to date without being treated in the onsite storage facilities for low, intermediate and high level SRW to be stored throughout the ANPP design life.
Table
Waste category | Specific activity, kBq/kg | ||
---|---|---|---|
Beta emitting nuclides | Alfa emitting nuclides (transuranic incl.) | Transuranic radionuclides | |
Very low level | below 102 | below 101 | below 1 |
Low level | 102 to 103 | 101 to 102 | 1 to 101 |
Intermediate level | 103 to 107 | 102 to 106 | 101 to 105 |
High level | over 107 | over 106 | over 105 |
Radiation safety standards define liquid radioactive waste (LRW) as organic and inorganic liquids, slimes (slurries) and slags unfit for further use, the specific activity of radionuclides in which, if taken in with drinking water, is ten times as high as the respective intervention levels.
The following LRW handling flowchart is used at the ANPP (Fig.
Drains formed in the course of the ANPP operation are reprocessed in evaporation vessels to be purified for further distillate use or discharge into the household sewage system. The vat residues formed in evaporation vessels as the result of the drains reprocessing are collected in the vat residue tanks (VRT) and reprocessed in the evaporation-to-the-maximum-salt concentration plant (EMSCP) (Figs
LRW is stored in the liquid radioactive waste storage facility, which receives vat residues from the evaporation vessels and depleted ion-exchange resins from active water treatment systems 1, 2 and 4.
The storage facility comprises
The storage facility capacity is 4140 m3, including:
Radioactive waste is managed in accordance with the “Procedures for the Radioactive Waste Management” approved by a decree of the Government of the Republic of Armenia in 2009 and the requirements of regulatory legal acts that govern the field of activity in question (
The ANPP operates an SRW handling system that provides for the SRW collection, sorting, transportation and safe storage in respective storage facilities (NP-020-15, 2015) (Fig.
The SRW storage facility with an effective capacity of 78.34 m3 occupies a part of the instrumentation room. High level SRW includes:
The SRW storage facility with an effective capacity of 1001.2 m3 is situated inside the special building. Intermediate level SRW includes:
The SRW storage with an effective capacity of 17051 m3 is situated at the NPP site. Low level SRW includes:
Table
No. | RW category | Storage (warehousing) point | Storage filling level, m3 | Storage capacity, m3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Solid low level waste | Solid low level waste storage facility | 7104.8 | 71051.0 |
2 | Solid intermediate level waste | Solid intermediate level storage facility | 490.86 (including 380.06 m3/1756 EMSCP salt melt/containers/) | 1001.32 |
EMSCP container interim storage area | 435.16 (1978 EMSCP containers) | Not more than 3000 containers | ||
3 | Solid high level waste | Solid high level waste storage facility | 37.64 | 78.34 |
4 | Liquid intermediate level waste (evaporation vessel vat residues) | VRTs 1–6, HLST 1 | 2416.6 | 3170 |
5 | Liquid intermediate level waste (slit, pulp) | HLST 2 | 267.0 | 350 |
Considering the amounts of radioactive waste formed in the process of the Armenian NPP operation, there is an objective need for building a low and intermediate level RW disposal facility.
To manage solid RW in an effective manner and reduce the SRW amounts formed, it is necessary to introduce sorting systems (depending on the waste composition: combustible and compressible waste) and minimize the waste amount (waste incineration, compaction and fragmentation).
As part of the activities to extend the life of the Armenian NPP’s unit 2, the “Program for Managing the RW Existing at the ANPP and Formed in the Course of the ANPP Unit 2 Extended Life” (the Program hereinafter) was developed. The Program presents more than 50 measures and the schedule for their implementation for the RW management, including the following:
Implementing the measures presented in the Program will ensure safe handling of LLW and ILW accumulated at the ANPP and formed during the extended life of the Armenian NPP’s unit 2.
The ANPP’s RW management system, which represents a set of organizational, technological and engineering measures aims at effective management of radioactive materials and includes the following key stages: collection, classification, processing, conditioning. It involves the use of modern technologies, taking into account the specific nature of each waste type and stringent compliance with regulatory requirements for ensuring human and environmental safety. The system will make it possible to handle VLLW, LLW and ILW, as well as LRW generated in the process of the ANPP decommissioning.
The final goal of the Program is to make the ANPP’s RW management system compliant with the requirements of the Republic of Armenia’s nuclear regulations and standards, and the requirements of the IAEA safety standards (
Management of radioactive waste is a complex and essential problem requiring a scientific and technological approach for minimize risks and ensuring human and environmental safety. Presented below is an analysis of the technological aspects involved in radioactive waste management, which considered the key engineering and scientific methods aimed at safe and effective management of materials containing radioactive elements:
The establishment of a national operator for performing the function of radioactive waste management will make it possible to implement the RW and SNF management system in accordance with the management structure adopted in most countries across the world with nuclear technologies.
Ensuring safe management of RW requires:
The paper considers the peculiarities of liquid and solid radioactive waste handling at the Armenian NPP’s unit 2. Issues of handling the RW generated in the process of operating the ANPP’s unit 2 in the course of the unit design and extended life are discussed, and measures are proposed for addressing the issues under consideration, including upgrading of the LRW reprocessing plant, which requires the LRW treatment process to be improved and involves improvement of the plant safety system for reducing risks and preventing potential accidents, as well as introduction of measures to reduce the adverse environmental impact, and development of a document that analyzes issues involved in treatment of both LRW and SRW to enable final waste disposal. Effective management of SRW and reduction of the waste amounts formed requires that waste amount minimization systems are introduced. To make it easier to manage different types of waste and unify waste management methods, it is necessary to classify radioactive waste in accordance with its physical, chemical, radiological and biological properties. The country needs to develop its own national classification of radioactive waste in accordance with the objectives defined in this field for introducing, in a harmonized manner, a unified national radioactive waste management policy and implementing successfully the selected strategy.
If implemented, the proposed solutions will contribute greatly to the introduction of a stable RW management system in the Republic of Armenia, and will make it possible to shape a new culture of radioactive waste management while placing emphasis on environmental protection, effective use of resources, providing high-quality services to business entities, and ensuring safe environmental conditions.
The ultimate goal is to make the ANPP’s RW management system maximally compliant with the current nuclear regulatory requirements in effect in the Republic of Armenia and the requirements of the IAEA safety standards.
To this end, a package of activities has been under way to update the issues at hand for analyzing the existing non-conformities.
The principles and technologies discussed aim to ensure effective and safe radioactive waste management at nuclear plants while minimizing the environmental impact and ensuring compliance with safety standards.