Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. The framework for the ‘need’
    • 2.1 Design/layout features and safety connection
    • 2.2 Evidence for fuel and clad weakness
    • 2.3 Design complexity
    • 2.4 Summary remarks
  • 3. The elements of the technological safety barrier
    • 3.1 As Low as Reasonably Acceptable (ALARA) principle
    • 3.2 The Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) approach
    • 3.3 The Extended Safety Margin Detection (E-SMD)
    • 3.4 The Independent assessment (IA)
    • 3.5 The Emergency Rescue Team (ERT)
  • 4. The new safety barrier
    • 4.1 The concept and the features
    • 4.2 The cross-link between the elements and the challenges
  • 5. Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by